Archive for the ‘The Arab and wider world’ Category

We’re not celebrating Israel’s anniversary

May 5, 2008

The Apartheid Wall

100 prominent British jews wrote this letter to the Guardian newspaper:

In May, Jewish organisations will be celebrating the 60th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel. This is understandable in the context of centuries of persecution culminating in the Holocaust. Nevertheless, we are Jews who will not be celebrating. Surely it is now time to acknowledge the narrative of the other, the price paid by another people for European anti-semitism and Hitler’s genocidal policies. As Edward Said emphasised, what the Holocaust is to the Jews, the Naqba is to the Palestinians.

In April 1948, the same month as the infamous massacre at Deir Yassin and the mortar attack on Palestinian civilians in Haifa’s market square, Plan Dalet was put into operation. This authorised the destruction of Palestinian villages and the expulsion of the indigenous population outside the borders of the state. We will not be celebrating.

In July 1948, 70,000 Palestinians were driven from their homes in Lydda and Ramleh in the heat of the summer with no food or water. Hundreds died. It was known as the Death March. We will not be celebrating.

In all, 750,000 Palestinians became refugees. Some 400 villages were wiped off the map. That did not end the ethnic cleansing. Thousands of Palestinians (Israeli citizens) were expelled from the Galilee in 1956. Many thousands more when Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza. Under international law and sanctioned by UN resolution 194, refugees from war have a right to return or compensation. Israel has never accepted that right. We will not be celebrating.

We cannot celebrate the birthday of a state founded on terrorism, massacres and the dispossession of another people from their land. We cannot celebrate the birthday of a state that even now engages in ethnic cleansing, that violates international law, that is inflicting a monstrous collective punishment on the civilian population of Gaza and that continues to deny to Palestinians their human rights and national aspirations.

We will celebrate when Arab and Jew live as equals in a peaceful Middle East.

Seymour Alexander
Ruth Appleton
Steve Arloff
Rica Bird
Jo Bird
Cllr Jonathan Bloch
Ilse Boas
Prof. Haim Bresheeth
Tanya Bronstein
Sheila Colman
Ruth Clark
Sylvia Cohen
Judith Cravitz
Mike Cushman
Angela Dale
Ivor Dembina
Dr. Linda Edmondson
Nancy Elan
Liz Elkind
Pia Feig
Colin Fine
Deborah Fink
Sylvia Finzi
Brian Fisher MBE
Frank Fisher
Bella Freud
Catherine Fried
Uri Fruchtmann
Stephen Fry
David Garfinkel
Carolyn Gelenter
Claire Glasman
Tony Greenstein
Heinz Grunewald
Michael Halpern
Abe Hayeem
Rosamine Hayeem
Anna Hellman
Amy Hordes
Joan Horrocks
Deborah Hyams
Selma James
Riva Joffe
Yael Oren Kahn
Michael Kalmanovitz
Paul Kaufman
Prof. Adah Kay
Yehudit Keshet
Prof. Eleonore Kofman
Rene Krayer
Stevie Krayer
Berry Kreel
Leah Levane
Les Levidow
Peter Levin
Louis Levy
Ros Levy
Prof. Yosefa Loshitzky
Catherine Lyons
Deborah Maccoby
Daniel Machover
Prof. Emeritus Moshe Machover
Miriam Margolyes OBE
Mike Marqusee
Laura Miller
Simon Natas
Hilda Meers
Martine Miel
Laura Miller
Arthur Neslen
Diana Neslen
Orna Neumann
Harold Pinter
Roland Rance
Frances Rivkin
Sheila Robin
Dr. Brian Robinson
Neil Rogall
Prof. Steven Rose
Mike Rosen
Prof. Jonathan Rosenhead
Leon Rosselson
Michael Sackin
Sabby Sagall
Ian Saville
Alexei Sayle
Anna Schuman
Sidney Schuman
Monika Schwartz
Amanda Sebestyen
Sam Semoff
Linda Shampan
Sybil Shine
Prof. Frances Stewart
Inbar Tamari
Ruth Tenne
Martin Toch
Tirza Waisel
Stanley Walinets
Martin White
Ruth Williams
Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi
Devra Wiseman
Gerry Wolff
Sherry Yanowitz


The Economist and The Gulf

May 1, 2008

This week’s economist has several iarticles on the Arabian Gulf. It’s quite disappointing to be honest, especially when you compare it to its amazing coverage on other topics like fund management (really recommended, if long reading). The coverage is superficial and not very novel, and some of the statements just seem ridiculous. Two stuck to my mind: One is the central claim that the Gulf countries are managing their wealth better than the seventies. That may be true (in some countries mind you, I don’t know if I’d include Bahrain), but that’s like saying a driver with -15 vision is better than a blind driver. The other one is that simply because the wealth is being invested by the private sector this time around, this means it’s better utilized when compared to the mainly government-driven investments in the 70s, which were marred by ridiculous grandiose projects and corruption.

Two points:

1. Much of this “private sector” is an illusion, it’s not what is meant by the private sector in the west. Much of it is by the same guys who made up the “government” previously, except now they don’t even have to pretend that they have government duties to deal with. Even though corruption existed before in government, at least some of the money was kept in the name of government. Now it’s all in the “private sector hands”, which remarkably are still the same people! It ain’t in your or my hands (oh wait, I forgot most of us are nidoers, yes it is in our hands). It’s what Baumol and Co. would call oligarchich capitalism, the kind that results in the worst type of capitalism there is: Few families pretty much owning everything and not giving a damn about the rest. This is not a benevolent private sector, but the phrase “private sector” is all the rage nowadays, so they’ll sure use it to their advantage.

2. The fact that it is the private sector does not mean that somehow by nature it will be better than the government, as the article seems to assume. There is nothing absolute that makes the private sector better by right of birth. It is just as likely to engage in ridiculous grandiose projects as the government would have. Take the example of the ridiculous grandiose resorts being built in EVERY SINGLE GULF country right now, include our own illustrious Riffa Views and co? First, do you think all of these projects, in every single country, will work and be prosperous in the long run? Especially considering you’re all copying each other? Have you taken a look at the Gulf recently? It’s boiling hot, unbelievably sticky, and the scenery is not exactly breath taking (except in Oman). It is not exactly a tourist hot spot, and no, you cannot all be Dubais. Dubai is built on being exceptional and the most excessive, “the best”. You can’t all be the “best”, it goes against the concept. These projects are just as insane as the plans to produce and subsidize wheat on a mass scale in Saudi Arabia in the 70s (which basically amounted to exporting Saudi water abroad, not a good idea in a desert country).

There are some gems in the report however, particularly:

“Unfortunately, the region’s diversification plans lack much diversity. For example, no fewer than 11 aluminium smelters are in the works, on top of two already in operation in Dubai and Bahrain. Mr Sfakianakis suspects the Gulf’s governments have heard the same advice from the same cadres of consultants. The GCC is guilty of a “me-too” approach to industrial development, says a report by the National Bank of Kuwait, which raises the risk of over-capacity not just in aluminium, but also in petrochemicals and property.”

If you all hire Charles River and Co, then you’ll all get Charles River advice! It won’t produce very innovative or original thinking, and in fact you’ll probably end up competing with each other and doing the same thing. But hey, we’re all enchanted by the white man’s burden aren’t we? I mean, these are big shot multinational consultancy names, run by Ivy League graduates, surely they know so much more about our countries than us? Let’s just delegate the whole economic policies of a country, the most important thing there is, you know, the things that usually ministries, parliaments and study groups devote most of their energy to in developed countires; let’s rid ourselves of that headache and delegate it to multinational consultancy companies! Better yet, let’s give them a blank cheque and the green light to do whatever they want, no questions asked! They’ll design our education system, our labour market, our health policy, how to manage oil wealth, you name it. I mean why not? We import everything else: labour, goods, cars, foods, you name it. Why not just import economic policy setters as well? That’ll make us look sophisticated, civilized and developed. Everyone will look up to us, just like when we built the biggest fountain the world or the biggest flag in the world.

It’s worth a read anyway, especially if you don’t have much background in the subject and are interested in a summary of the issues.

And happy labour day!


March 7, 2008

A bit dry. You have been warned.

So the other day I wanted to change some Dinars into euros. I nearly got a heart attack.

Seriously, can anyone familiar with economics give me one good reason why the Dinar is yet to be revaluated against the dollar? Why don’t they up that damned fixed exchange rate?

We are in an unprecedented boom. The economy is flush with oil money going crazy bouncing up and down not knowing where to put itself. The economy is overheating. Prices have reached ridiculous proportions.

Now basic first year undergraduate economics would tell you that when your economy is overheating you as a government want to put up your interest rates. Make money and loans dearer and scarcer. That way some of that money flying around like a madman gets put and saved away while people stop taking out loans at ridiculously low rates.

Now because of that damned fixed exchange rate we basically have no control over interest rates. We have to take whatever is set in the U.S. But guess what? The U.S. has its own problems to deal with that are completely different than ours. The economy there is coughing and teetering on recession because of the credit (subprime) crisis. Defaults on mortgages are soaring, banks no longer want to give loans, new houses being built have dried up and people are poorer since house prices are not as valuable as before. For them (or so the Fed thinks), the best thing is to keep cutting interest rates so that credit doesn’t dry up and hence the economy is reinvigorated. They couldn’t give a damn that Bahrain would rather have higher interest rates.

At the same time the bloody dollar keeps sliding against every currency worth noting (except the yen). The bloody American trade deficit keeps widening and the dollar keeps sliding. What does this mean? Basically Americans are consuming way more than what they are producing. All those cheap chinese imports (among others) being gobbled up are way more than what America is selling to the rest of the world. So what can America do? It basically has to borrow to finance this over-consuming. How? By issueing government bonds with low interest rates that basically get bought up by China, Japan, the Far East and us gulf countries. Basically, we are financing the out of proportion consumerism of America by lending to them at ridiculously low interest rates.

And the dollar keeps sliding. Because interest rates are so low putting your money in America is not as attractive as it used to be. Why put your money in America and get 3% while you could put it in the UK and get 5.5%? This with the large trade deficit, which means America is borrowing more and more, makes the dollar unattractive and it keeps sliding.

But why should America care about the low dollar? Short of a massive run on the dollar (i.e. a crash in its value, which is probably unlikely), lower exchange rate makes American goods cheaper and increases their exports to the world. It helps offset that massive trade deficit. I remember when I was in the States I could not believe how cheap things were compared to Europe. It was ridiculous. Food was less than half price. This makes American goods attractive and more of them get sold abroad. That trade deficit would be much worse if the dollar was not so low.

And we in Bahrain get shafted in the process. No one needs to be told that Bahrain is completely dependent on imports. From our cars to our ACs to our labour (more on that in a bit), we import everything. Now given the Dinar is tied to the dollar, we cannot benefit from cheaper American imports due to the lower dollar as other countries do. We are fixed against it! No lower dollar for us! We cannot benefit from our exports increasing either due to the cheaper dollar (and by default the cheaper dinar), since we do not really have exports to speak off except oil and aluminum. Both of those are commodities controlled by world market prices. We do not make any cars or fridges to speak off so that we can export them.

At the same time, we keep suffering from more expensive imports from other countries. As the dollar falls agains the euro and the pounds, everything coming from Europe becomes more expensive. Just compare the price of an BMW M3 back when the euro was first launched and its price now.

Then we come to the most important import to Bahrain: Labour. We are completely dependant on expat Labour, particularly from the Indian subcontinent. They make 2/3 of our labour force. Now the Indian rupee has appreciated against the dollar by more than 20% this year alone. Guess what? That makes labour from abroad more expensive. When an expat last year could send 100 rupees back home, the same amount of dinars nowadays only lets him send 80 rupees. What they send back home have basically been cut by 20% in one year. Who wouldn’t get pissed off if their salary was cut by 20%, especially if you’ve been paid peanuts already and live in a country with rising prices? This is the immediate cause of the expat labour revolts that have happened recently (more on that later).

So imports have become more expensive due to the damned dollar falling. So has labour. Prices have soared. But this is not the whole story about prices.

Before we go into this prices story, let’s get one thing clear. This whole talk about how inflation in Bahrain is 4% is rubbish. It is a mistake at best, or a lie at worst. Only someone as naive, or beink bankrolled as Oxford Business Group (I’m not sure which one of the previous it is) would dare boast about how low inflation is in Bahrain. Every single evidence points otherwise. Use your informal judgement to begin with. House prices have sky rocketed over the last few years. So has food prices. In a country where food and accommodation spending make up so much how can we have 4% inflation? Add to this the rise in wages of both the locals in government jobs and the expat sector, and then as Ibrahim Sharif has rightly pointed out the increase in Broad Money (M2 and above) and there is no way in hell that the inflation is 4%. The fact that the government is fretting and has allocated 80 million dinars for spending on goods whose prices have soared just shows how ridiculous this number is.

So what caused these massive price hikes witnessed right throughout the gulf? Well, as we mentioned there is the lower exchange rates which made imports and expat labour more expensive. This is not all. There are some global causes which we cannot do much about. Import prices, particularly of food, have jumped up significantly due to higher fuel prices, the switch to biofuels and countries like India and China consuming more meat. What does this mean? Let’s start with biofuels. They are made out of maize (corn), so maize that was before used for food is now spent on biofuels. Less food is around so the prices go up. Then there is the fact that China and India have become richer, and hence eat more meat. Meat needs more input to produce (think of grass, water etc to feed the chicken and cows) and hence because of the extra resources going into this the price of the rest of food go up. So we end up with more expensive food.

Then there is the fact that our economy is booming and heating up. Demand and wages are pushed up and hence prices go up as well.

So there you have it, lower exchange rate, more expensive imports, pricier labour, food price jumps and an economy going overboard because of an oil boom has pushed our prices up.

Now in a modern capitalist society, what can you as a policy maker do to help control this price spike? Well, the obvious candidate is monetary policy. i.e. as we said before, increase the bloody interest rate. Now in Bahrain we can’t do that since we are tied to the dollar and we basically have to take American monetary policy. This, as we said, is doing the exact opposite and cutting interest rates. Crap.

Alright, well another indirect way is to increase our exchange rate against the U.S. dollar. Put the dinar up! This makes imports from the U.S. and also from other countries much cheaper, and so should help keep inflation down. No one is asking here that you completely break the link with the dollar, that is crazy talk of course. Just put the bloody exchange rate up! Instead we have our Central Bank Governor complaining that foreign exchange dealers are doing what any sane person does, which is buy dinars since they know at one point or another they will have to revalue the dinar (buy dinar is their message, you may stand to make a nice profit if it’s revalued against the dollar).

One of the last thing you want to do is throw even more money at the economy. This is unfortunately what the government is doing. It’s solution is to increase expenditure, commiting itself to more and more spending. More money gets spent, there is more money circulating in the economy, and guess what, that causes prices to soar. Other than the price hike, it also commits the government to the same level of spending in the future. It’ll be very hard politically to then cut down the spending. What will they do if the oil prices drop and they don’t have the revenues anymore to sustain their current expenditure?

This is all the more stark given that these price hikes bite the poor and middle class much more than the upper class. Most of the benefits of growth in the economy has been confined to the rich. The poor and the middle class, with their wages no where increasing as much as prices, have seen their purchasing power steadily get eroded. The basked they could buy 5 years ago is no longer affordable at current prices (just think of how pricy it’s now to buy a house).

So the economy is expanding, but most of this is confined to a small elite. At the same time prices have shot up. People can no longer afford stuff they used to buy. The government would ideally raise interest rates but it can’t since it’s tied to America, where the government has actually been cutting interest rates. At the same time it stubbornly refuses to revalue the exchange rate. Can someone tell me, for the sake and health of my accounts, why is this so?


Talking about subprime crises, here is some comedy from the brilliant bird and fortune:

and how brilliant is this (but that is not how the arab mind works!):

The Sale of Bahrain

February 8, 2008

In early 2006 an innocuous looking bunch of articles ran in our newspapers that were very similar to this one:

“The Minister of Finance, H.E. Shaikh Ahmed bin Mohammed Al Khalifa, said that the privatization of Al Hidd Power & Water Station came within the framework of the privatization strategy adopted by the Government of the Kingdom of Bahrain and its aim of enhancing the role of the private sector in the development process and of creating the appropriate environment for attracting more foreign and local investment.


The purchase price proposed by the winning bidder is US$ 738 million. The total project value amounts to US$ 1.25 billion. This includes the purchase price for the existing plant and the cost of establishing the third phase of the project. The winning bidder is a consortium comprising International Power / Suez Energy International / Sumitomo Corporation. The Minister said that the achievements witnessed in the financial, economic and investment sectors in Bahrain reflected the support extended to those sectors by His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, His Highness the Prime Minister, Shaikh Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa and His Highness the Crown Prince and Commander-in-Chief of the Bahrain Defence Force, Shaikh Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa. He said that similar steps had been undertaken in key economic sectors like transport, telecommunications & ports.”

So, just like that, our water and electricity plants has been sold off to Belgian, Japanese, and British investors. As expected, there was no fuss about this in the local media. There was hardly even a mention or a comment on the sale. Everything went by smoothly and unnoticed.

Let me, for emphasis sake, repeat the essence of the above piece. We have sold off the plant that pretty much generates ALL of the water and electricity in Bahrain to far flung companies in Europe and Japan. We no longer own anything that is able to produce water and electricity for us. All of our water and electricity production is in the hands of management in Tokyo, London and Brussels.

Could someone tell me how is this a brilliant idea?

Now, in a way, this is all part and parcel of the so called “neo-liberal” craze that has been sweeping through the region, usually at the behest and encouragement of such great institutions like the World Bank, the IMF, and consultancy firms. So what is this “neoliberal” ideology i.e. what is neoliberalism? Now I’m not going to sit here and pontificate on neo-liberalism, but I’ll give a quick rough and ready overview that is suitable for my purposes. It is basically the belief that well defined markets and private property are best and should be left to their own devices in running the economy. If there are well defined private property laws and there is a suitable judicial and administrative body to support it, economic activity should be determined primarily and solely through markets. Government intervention, if at all, should only be limited to making sure that the markets are well defined, to dealing with market failures, and that there are proper rules and regulation to support these markets. The state sector should be in no business of getting involved in economic activity, whether buying, selling, or running anything. It should limit itself to issues of transparency, regulation, protection, and enforceability. Make laws protecting business; if they are broken punish those who do break them; etc….. If, to begin with, there is no proper structure for free markets to take hold and the private sector is in shambles, then the primary goal of the state is to make sure that whatever is needed is put into effect for such markets and private sectors to emerge.

In this piece I’m going to focus on this idea of selling off the state’s assets. Let’s get back to our example. JUST TO RE-EMPHASIZE, Bahrain no longer has national ownership, let alone control, of either Water or electricity in the country. Sure, it regulates the price and quality which it is sold at, but it does not own any of the plants!

Now why in god’s name would anyone decide to do this, to sell off assets in the two most vital sectors in the economy that are pretty much needed for LIFE itself? Well let’s dismiss one irrelevant argument out of hand. One popular reason people give for letting the private sector take over is that the private sector is more efficient in managing and running a place. It is driven by profit and cost issues, etc, while the government sector is not and has a whole host of other political, social etc issues to deal with. Furthermore, there is constant innovation and creative destruction, while the government inevitably falls into corruption and bureacratic drag. I’m not going to go into deeply into this argument, but even if it is correct, this is no justification whatsover for selling off your assets. This is a justification for the private sector MANAGING and RUNNING the establishements. It has nothing to do with selling the places off to them. Many countries, such as France, have these vital sectors owned by the state itself but they are run by the private sector. If there are gains to be had from the private sector taking over management (and even this is debatable in this case) then let them take over running it but you don’t need to sell it off to them!

So what reasons do governments usually have for letting the private sector own assets in areas which are usually the terrain of the government, let alone in such vital sectors as these (please keep in mind throughout that we are talking about ELECTRICITY AND WATER here)? Well, the usual reasons are: 1. the government is broke and really needs money 2. It is a way of attracting investment in building new plants and establishments 3. to foster competition. I think it’s pretty obvious none of these work here in the case of Bahrain. Let’s go through them.

1. This is the reason why a lot of the countries, especially in the “third world”, do this. You’re broke, you don’t have money, and you need it fast….. or simply the rulers want to make a few extra bucks through a shady deal. Now I’ll assume the shady deal one doesn’t apply in our case. Either way, the being broke should definitely NOT apply in our case. We are an oil country in the middle of an unprecedented oil boom. We should have cash to burn, and we do, given that we have spent a billion dollars over the last five years on Weapons frmo the U.S. alone. We are not a cash strapped country looking for ways to close up our budget holes. Given our humungous oil windfall economic logic tells we should be exporting capital (just witness the mind-boggling sizes of sovereign wealth funds operated by the neighbouring gulf countries), not selling off our own assets. The above SHOULD NOT BE A REASON to sell off the Hidd plant.

2. The country needs investment in it, especially in such important areas like water and electricity. Privatizing them is a way to attract investment into such long term projects by creating incentives for investors to come in. They’ll have ownership, so they’ll be willing to put their money in. So the argument goes. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but:

a. This should not be a reason to sell off ALREADY EXISTING ASSETS. At most this should be a reason to allow them to keep ownership of newly built assets that they build. Even on only that measure the government has failed miserably. First, it has utterly failed in attracting people to invest and put their own money in NEW projects in the water and electricity sector, although they have been trying really really hard. No one it seems is willing to put their money and risk here. And who can blame them? Given how little the government seems to care about these two crucial sectors when compared to how they’ve taken care of more frivolous projects like Amwaj, Riffa Views, and Durrat Al Bahrain.

This takes me to the second point. Given our oil boom the country SHOULD HAVE ENOUGH FUNDS ON ITS OWN to cater to such crucial sectors. They are a priority. We DO NOT NEED external investment, not in these sectors. Given how much we have poured down the Formula 1, etc, we should be able to stomp up an extra 1 billion somewhere to build a decent water and electricity plant which would keep us viable for the next 30 years or so. This should not be hard. Given our government’s obsession with fast bucks however, this money gets instead put on less crucial projects such as: (pick from the list, I’m sure you know it by heart now).

3. Government monopolies are no good. It’s better to let the private sector compete and you will reap the rewards. Just look at how the competition between Vodafone and Batelco has been so good to the country. Prices are down, products are better, everyone is happy (except Batelco).

This argument is so wrong on so many fronts. First, just like in the first point, you can have competition in terms of management and delivery of services, no need to sell of your assets. Second, in this case there is no competition to speak off! There is ONE company that the government has sold the whole bloody thing off to! That’s it. And finally, the mechanism at work here is completely different than in something like the telecommunication industry. The way things usually work here is that the government and the company agrees a price at which the government buys the output from the company for a certain period of time (usually several years), then the government sells the output to consumers at a subsidized price (way below costs). Market prices play no role here, although I’,m pretty certain the government’s ultimate goal is to pass on the full price to consumers. Watch out for that coming your way eventually, and by that point if the market functions as it’s supposed to you might be paying monopoly prices since there is only one supplier!

In short, there is no real justification for these shenanigans that the government has engaged in. I mean, at the end of the day, it’s pretty darn obvious why it’s better for a small vulnerable country of our size to own its own water and electricity supplies. It’s the same reason why you’d rather own your own house. It’s something that is absolutely vital to you, and you would rather not be dependant on someone else for such a massively important thing, especially when that someone is the only supplier selling such a crucial product which gives him a lot of power and bargaining chips over you!

This is such a clear concept, and I suspect the government knows this. The best example to illustrate this is the fact that the only industry who has gone against this privatization trend is the oil industry. The government has bought a 100% of Bapco over the last decade, even though they have pretty much sold everything else. Why? Well they probably know that oil is black gold, and it brings in huge wads of cash, and it is absolutely vital to the state of the country. Electricity and water should be just as vital to a country, except the difference here is that running water and electricity brings nothing but hassle, trouble, and extra expenditure to the government. There is no money to be made here, unlike in the oil sector. In fact there is money to be lost in subsidizing m people. Then you have to deal with the hassle of running and managing the thing and of dealing with public outcries whenever something happens. I suspect this is the real reason, along with the crazy fever of neoliberalism sweeping the region, which has driven such government sales.

This is of course not to mention any of the “non-economic arguments”. So far we haven’t mentioned any other relevant important factors, paramount of them is national security. Somehow it didn’t cross any people’s mind that it is not the best idea to sell of the country’s most vital assets which life itself depends on to companies that have nothing to do or have no interest in the region except to make money. All of this in a region which is not exactly known for its stability and its lack of surprises. What happens if we go into a war? How will these vital resources be secured? etc.. etc…

The most ironic thing about these sales is that they are promoted as evidence of a move towards development and modernity, towards copying more “civilized” countries, while really they are the absolute opposite of this. The only countries that engage in such sale of their most vital assets to completely foreign owned companies are developing “third world countries”. Countries like Jordan, which has sold off its plants to French companies, or countries like those in South America which were forced to sell pretty much anything of value in the countries to Western companies. You’d have to search very hard to find western countries that sell of their electricity and water resources wholesale to some company from a far flung place. Can you imagine the headlines if Saudi Arabia acquired all of the UK’s power and water generating companies? How about if the United States supplies became dependant on Kuwaiti companies? Remember the outcry when a Dubai company dared to buy something as innocuous as the management of a port in the U.S.?

And of course water and electricity is nothing but the most extreme, most obvious examples of how horribly wrong this policy has gone. As the respected minister boasts in the article quoted in the beginning, this sale of assets has encompassed many many sectors, and expect more to come if it’s possible to sell them. For I suspect that “Bahrain holdings” company is possibly in many ways a display shop for a garage sale of what’s left in the government’s hands in Bahrain. Want an airline? No problem we have Gulf Air, how much you’re offering? Sold!! How about Aluminum? Who knows until what point this will reach.

I doubt this will stop until we will shake off this neo-liberal delirium, and that does not look like it will happen until the oil runs out. Then we will wake up, rub our eyes, and realize that we are in a massive hangover. Just like other third world countries, we will find that all of our important assets and resources are owned by some foreign companies that mean nothing to us (including massive chunks of the sea if this report is to be believed), and just like third world countries, we will find ourselves too oil-poor, too dependant and too vulnerable to do much about it. We will face classic dillemmas faced by developing countries which we shouldn’t because of the oil we have. And the problem is this hangover won’t last for a day but for a really long long time.

Enjoy the water you’re drinking and the laptop you’re powering using that electricity folks, just remember that you’re buying it from the Belgians, the British and the Japanese.

A hero has fallen

January 29, 2008


One by one, heroes of a not so distant time when people were more more principled, more passionate and more optimistic fall.

George Habash; Medic, intellectual, visionary, PFLP founder, Arab Nationalist leader, a personal hero and one of the most remarkable people to ever set foot on this earth has died.

His body may have fallen, but his ideas, actions and dreams will continue to inspire us to the future he made us thirst for.

I can not express it better than Karma Nabulsi, so I simply link to her words.

Rest in peace George Habash and may some of us live up to our duty of making all of your dreams come true.

Some Random (Non-Nidoey) Rants

May 28, 2007

I’m (hopefully) back to blogging again. The last few weeks have been eventful to say the least, but hopefully I’m over that and can blog for a bit. There’s a lot swarming around in my head and I don’t even know where to start (the hanger series I started in the last post has about another nine posts that I’m planning to include, but it’ll be impressive if I can actually put them all on paper). For this post I’ll just limit myself to ranting about some current developments (which is not what I like to write about usually).

On the local scene the most striking event in my opinion has been the fiasco surrounding the alleged sale of fasht el jarem. What is most striking about this is not the temerity or absolute disregard shown by our government. We are used to that. After all they have already destroyed Tubli Bay, Dohat Arad, the surrounding coasts and seas of Muharraq, confiscated most of Bahrain’s coast to private elite hands, etc etc. What is surprising and actually encouraging is that people seem to have had enough and have decided to make some sort of stance against it, even if they are only shy and symbolic steps and even if the anger has been vented out at the wrong parties (parliament, irrelevant ministers, etc, your usual fall guys). It reminds me of an old post on a now defunct bahraini blog about glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) in Bahrain. If you allow relative freedom of speech and openness to take place in a corrupt and archaic political situation like ours, and if you don’t couple this with reforms in the country, then people will start talking about the corruption, they will notice what is going around them, and they will start to demand change, whether you want it or not.

Protection of our sea resources, not to mention other natural resources such as agricultural land and the atmosphere, even if it magically happens overnight tomorrow, is obviously unfortunately too little too late. A lot of the coasts and the coral reefs have already been destroyed, and once these resources are destroyed it is pretty much impossible to recover them. However, trying to salvage what remains is better than nothing. This is especially crucial in a small island that has for all its history depended on the sea as its primary source of income. Building up investment banks and misguided grand tourist projects (such as the grotesque riffa views and amwaj islands) is all good and dandy, but you better make sure beforehand you have the necessities of life adequately supplied. Grand islands and buildings are useless if you have no water or food to keep yourself alive in order to benefit from these projects. At this rate there will be no chanad, safi, and hamour, let alone the already dead agricultural local products left for us. We’ll be completely dependant on outside countries for food. That is not a situation we should be in. Let us hope the government heeds the call of the people. I’m not holding my breath.

We all know the source of this problem. Even a ten year old kid does not need to be told who is behind this theft and destruction of resources that should be owned collectively by all the country and its people. I’ll give you a hint. It is not the esteemed ministers of the cabinet. The honourable Fahmi Al Jowdar did not wake up one day and decide, “Hey, I have a great idea. I will sell more than 200 squared kilometers of Bahrain’s maritime resources to some foreigners under the pretext of developing the country!” (less than 1 billion dollars for more than 200 km squared of land? I haven’t heard of a worse deal since Russia sold Alaska off to America for $7.2 million dollars. One wonders if this deal is true how much has actually been undeclared, stolen and siphoned off to some offshore banks. I wouldn’t be surprised if it runs into several billion dollars). Neither did the honourable Minister bin Rajab suddenly get a Eureka moment and decree, “I will sell off a massive chunk of the coasts of Muharraq! And not a single drop of the money will enter into the coffers of the state! And I won’t tell or give a sod about anyone! After all who dares point a finger at me?” No, ministers cannot even sell their shoes without prior approval. They do not make these sorts of decisions. I think we all know who are behind this. You can count the individuals on the (three) fingers of one hand. One of the concerned individuals has even been affectionately nicknamed “eflan ba7ar”, translated as “eflan of the sea” (replace eflan with a name that rhymes with that word); not because of his affection for all things maritime, but because of his affection for selling huge chunks of Muharraqi sea (allegedly the sale of 49 km squared went to him and a similar plot to one of the other individuals concerned here). This problem will unfortunately not be solved unless we can hold these individuals accountable for their rampage and theft. Maybe, just maybe, that will happen in our lifetime and before everything is sold off and destroyed for a petty few american dollars.

On the regional level, one cannot but feel distraught, angry, and ashamed at what is being done to the Palestinian refugees in Naher el Bared camp in Lebanon. It seems all the political parties in Lebanon have decided to cynically gang up on the helpless 40,000 refugees living in squalid conditions in 1km squared of land and to blame all the ills of the country on them. The government, the army, the Harriri camp, the Lebanese forces, 3awn and astonishingly even Hizballah officials and the communist party have all decided to gang up and support the arbitrary destruction of the camp on the pretext of routing out roughly 200 (yes, you read that right, 200) militants who are not even Palestinians. I’m sorry to say but even the speech of Hassan Nasrallah (whom I respect very much and is my favourite current Arabic leader) is not worth much when every single other Hizballah official is cheering on the destruction of the camp. On a side note, you have to admire Nasralleh, regardless of whether you support him or not. My favourite part of his speech was when he sarcastically mocked certain groups by criticizing the government for: 1. not consulting others before deciding to launch the attack (on the camp). and for 2. ruining the summer tourism season in Lebanon. Guess who used the exact same arguments last summer to criticize Hizballah when Israel decided to ruthlessly bombard lebanon using the pretext of Hizballah seizing two of its soldiers? I’ll give you a hint: It was not Hizballah.

So what is exactly going on there at the moment and who are these fat7 al-islam and who backs them (or used to back them before turning on them)? The truth of the matter is no one really knows, well none of us who are not directly involved in it anyway. However, the infamous (for his scoops and insider stories that usually turn out to be true) and respected reporter Seymour Hersh alleges in a now famous article from last March and in a recent CNN interview that it is the Harriri group, Saudi Arabia, and Washington that have created and funded it before turning on it currently. And when Seymour Hersh writes people listen and usually believe him because he more often than not turns out to be correct. I seriously recommend reading the article linked to above, as it is quite revealing, particularly when one considers it was written two months ago.

What is beyond doubt is that both Syria (and by extension Hizballah) and the Harriri crew have financially backed and armed extremist sunni groups in Palestinian camps all over Lebanon. There are widespread allegations that Syria and Hizballah are behind certain groups in some camps (my own reliable Palestinian sources). There are also widespread allegations that the Harriri crew have also backed, financed and armed other militant groups in Palestinian camps such as 3usbat al Ansar (for one source on this, see Angry Arab). What is beyond doubt is that these groups have nothing to do with the Palestinian cause (being situated in the north of Lebanon and hundreds of kilometers away from the border is not exactly conducive to launching attacks on Israel, particularly when you consider that they don’t have any planes or helicopters and they only number 200). What is also beyond doubt is that these groups are absolutely hated by residents of the camps (if you ever get the chance ask any of the residents), and that they have nothing to do with them but have been forced upon them. You only have to look at the dead of fat7 al-islam to realize this. None of the dead are Palestinians, but they come from diverse countries such as Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Pakistan (the military commander is actually Lebanese (Source: Angry Arab)).

Now the internal politics of Lebanon are none of my business, and of course I have no right lecturing Lebanese on their own country which they know better than anyone else. But when it comes to helpless Palestinian refugees who are densely packed in a run down camp and are being made scapegoats for the ills of the country and are indiscriminately bombed, with several mosques, hospitals, houses, and market places being destroyed (source: Angry Arab), then it is our duty to stand up and condemn this. We are all supposed to give support and solidarity to the Palestinians, not bomb them, just like we all gave support and solidarity to Lebanon when Israel bombarded it. Writing a post about this is the least one can do. I urge you to do the same.

Also on the regional level, the latest news from Iraq is that Khalil Al-Zahawi, arguably the most respected and most talented calligraphist of modern times, has been killed. ًWelcome to the new, modern Iraq-American style. The citadel of Arab democracy and a beacon of light and hope for all the region. Welcome to a country where hundreds of professors and academics have been killed, where thousands of doctors have been maimed or fled the country, where the historic Al-Mutannabi street, long reverred as the heart of Arab intellectual, literary and artistic activity has been bombed to smithereens. Welcome to the modern Iraq, traditionally reputed as having one of the best health, educational, and academic systems in the Arab world, and long renknowned as having the highest readership and best schools of music in the Arab world (with such greats as Naseer Shamma hailing from there), where now even its museums and archaelogical sites, a symbol a country’s civilization and heritage, have been looted and reduced to rubble. Welcome to the new Iraq, long regarded as a model of Shia-Sunni harmony in the region, where it was normal for people across the Sunni-Shi3i divide to intermarry (and I have many friends who are children of those marriages), where now having a certain name gets you shot on the street with no questions asked. Welcome to the new Iraq, long held as a symbol of female empowerment in the region, where now you can get raped and shot for not wearing a daffa. Welcome to the new iraq, where armed gangs (with American and British troops at the top of this list) supported and financed by regional and international superpowers run amok in a country sent back to the middle ages and on the verge of being divided up into small, sectarian pieces.

Where now are all those bloggers, journalists, academics and individuals, particularly the Arab ones, who supported and cheered on the invasion under the pretext of liberating and bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq? Where are all those who despicably believed and propagated all the American grandiose lies about turning iraq into a model for the region? I hope you one day get to answer and pay for all the falsities and extravagant claims you helped to propagate. You are complicit in this despicable situation. Why have you suddenly hushed down on the subject when four or three years ago you were eagerly churning out post after post and article after article about how great the American invasion will be for us? You are despicable. The least you can do is come out and admit your mistakes and apologize to your readers and the rest of us for the hell you have gleefully cheered on.

Shame, Shame on you.

Today’s music choice is the awesome hip-hop song with in-your-face lyrics “The Poverty of Philosophy” by Immortal Technique. (Warning: the song contains some explicit language.)

Immortal Technique – The Poverty of Philosophy